******

Quote:

Zombies are the middle children of the otherworldly family. Vampires are the oldest brother who gets to have a room in the attic, all tripped out with a disco ball and shag carpet. Werewolves are the youngest, the babies, always getting pinched and told they're cute. With all that attention stolen away from the middle child zombie, no wonder she shuffles off grumbling, "Marsha, Marsha, Marsha."

- Kevin James Breaux
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts

Thursday, April 30, 2020

Top 10 Favorite Sci-Fi Novels



I don’t read a lot of science fiction novels but when I do I usually really enjoy them but mostly near future sci-fi and not so much of the distant future variety.  This being said, unlike with horror novelists whom I kind of stick to, my sci-fi reading is all over the place.  For this “Top 10” list I’ve put together a list of novels many of which I’ve read several times and even if they are not all the best they are ones I really enjoy.  Make sure to leave your comments and don’t forget to post your own list:

      1.       Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton
      2.       The Stepford Wives by Ira Levin
      3.       Sphere by Michael Crichton
      4.       Loop by Koji Suzuki
      5.       2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clark
      6.       The Island of Doctor Moreau by H.G. Wells
      7.       Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
      8.       Planet of the Apes by Pierre Boulle
      9.       Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
     10.   Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Book Review: TOP 100 FANTASY MOVIES by Gary Gerani



Fantastic Press and writer Gary Gerani have started a series of film books detailing the best in cinematic genre films.  They’ve already released one on horror and sci-fi films and now they’ve tackled fantasy films with Top 100 Fantasy Movies.  This is a book designed not just for fantasy film fans but all film enthusiasts. 

What I love about Gerani’s books and most importantly this book is that he has put together a comprehensive list of some of the greatest fantasy films from all of film history.  There are also many International films as well.  Unlike his previous two books, there are many films in this collection I’ve never even heard of (but now will actively go look out for).  The main reason many of these films have been chosen is not just because they are great films but because they had a profound effect on the genre and on the history of film itself.

All of the entries include brief credits and a synopsis but it is in Gerani’s “Why It’s Important” section of each film that really informs the reader.  It’s a common mistake (or overlook) that audiences who see an older film for the first time is displaced by what they are seeing forgetting that the film they are watching was made in a different time period with different technical achievements and story requirements.  Gerani does an excellent job of reminding readers why a particular film was so important for the time in which it is made as well as why it is relevant now.  So many “Best of…” lists consists of more modern films forgetting everything that came before but Gerani never forgets this an in fact there is a great many films on his list that were made in the ‘30s-‘50s as well as films from all over the world.

Now, I know that I mentioned before that there are some International films on Gerani’s list but it is not completely comprehensive but it does include some of the most influential such as Pan’s Labyrinth (2006), Donkey Skin (1970), The Seventh Seal (1957), The Miracle of Marcelino (1955), and Beauty And the Beast (1946), to name a few.  This is still a great sampling of films for audiences who may not have explored fantasy films from other countries.

Another great aspect of the book (which includes all the books in the series) is the plethora of posters and photos that accompany each of the entries.  This is a great book for film lovers that’s very informative and enlightening about fantasy films that would be a great addition to anyone’s library.

Friday, January 17, 2014

Book Review: SCI-FI MOVIE FREAK by Robert C. Ring



Every sci-fi movie fan should have a book that chronicles some of the best that the genre has to offer but sadly Robert C. Ring’s Sci-Fi Movie Freak is not one of them.  There is no doubt that Ring’s book chronicles a lot of sci-fi films and most notably a lot of classics which have indeed been overlooked over the years (and some even forgotten).  Ring’s book is broken up into 5 main chapters which include “Best of the Best,” “Vital Viewing,” “Further Essentials,” “Lesser-Known Gems,” and “The Failures.”  This amounts to chapters that more-or-less all sound the same except it’s a manner of opinion which would be in the “Best of the Best” verses “Vital Viewing” verses “Further Essentials” chapter.  A more definitive grouping could have been more helpful such as a sub genre designation.  Sci-fi is such a diversified genre that there could have been an infinitely better way of categorizing the films into chapters especially since it is a reference book. 

Ring does put the films in chronological order within each chapter, which is actually a good thing as the reader gets to watch the progression of the genre from one film to the next up until modern day.  He also touches upon a lot of genuine classics but I’m not exactly sure about his tone towards some of the films he’s decided to highlight.  His thoughts on It Came From Outer Space (1953), which is in the “Further Essentials” chapter are, “There are plenty of moments of cliché and simplicity, however like the sappiness contained in the opening…that mar the experience for the modern viewers.”  He also describes RoboCop (1987), “Though RoboCop has shortcomings as a story, it is a smartly made film.  It is packed with stock bad guys and pushes through key elements with a lack of logic…”  I sometimes wonder why he bothered to include these entries in the first place rather than pick other films in their place.

I also question some of his choices of inclusion as sci-fi films such as 28 Days Later (2002), 28 Weeks Later (2007), The Host (2006), or The Return of the Living Dead (1985), to name a few.  These films obviously don’t really fit into the sci-fi mode and Ring doesn’t really explain why he’s chosen to include these films.  This leaves the reader pondering what his criteria is for judging the films.

I do have to give credit to Ring for including a good sampling of animated sci-fi films which usually go absent in these types of books but he does highlight Iron Giant (1999), Akira (1988), Metropolis (2001), and Fantastic Planet (1973), to name a few.  For some odd reason Ring felt compelled to included TV specials in his analysis of the genre with Family Guy: Blue Harvest (2007) and The Star Wars Holiday Special (1978) which seems more to populate the book with additional Star Wars reference films (he lights four out of the six films already plus the spoof Spaceballs).  

For me, there was more wrong with the book than right and with there being plenty of other books on the genre out there this is a book that can be passed by.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Movie review: 51 (2011)



Area 51 is probably one of the most famous locations in the world because of its association with UFOs and alien enthusiasts but now all will be revealed to the public.  This is the plot of 51 (2011) in which a reporter and TV personality are allowed full access to area 51 in order to finally dispel the rumors once and for all.  Bruce Boxleitner is Col. Martin who is in charge of escorting the civilians into the complex but everything does not go as planned as an alien shape shifter held in the underground secret labs of the already secret labs escapes and releases an even deadlier predatory alien and its offspring.  The aliens create havoc allowing the shape shifter to proceed with its ulterior motives all the while Col. Martin and his charges try to find a way out of the complex while not trying to be killed by the predatory aliens or allowing any of the aliens free to the outside world.
 
Along for the chaos is Sgt. Hannah (Rachel Miner) and her fellow soldier and friend Shoes Schumacher (Jason London) who are also trying to kill the predatory aliens before they get killed themselves.  The film is fun, gory and entertaining from beginning to end and works because the characters take their situation seriously despite the fact that it is an alien film.  London is hilarious from beginning to end and he has great chemistry with Miner.  The creature FX is extremely good and convincing for such a low budget film.  This film will appease horror fans.

51 is one of those rare low budget sci-fi-horror hybrid films that actually work and it continues to surprise up until the end.  The film is written by Lucy Mukerjee with story by Kenny Yakkel and is directed by Jason Connery.  They do an excellent job with the film creating one of the few low budget indie gems out there of this kind.

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Web Series Review: LOST IN THE WOODS – Season 1




The proliferation of the independent web series is everywhere and there are both those that are good and those that are not so good, those with good production values and those that don’t even know a production value is, those with good acting and those with their friends and family members as the actors and depending upon the type and style of the series this can be a good or bad thing.  This being said the Matt Nielsen created web series “Into the Woods” lies somewhere in the middle.  At just 10 episodes each about 2 minutes long (making the entire series a little over 20 minutes in length) there is a lot that is in store for the series’ audience but there is also something left to be desired.


The story is about four strangers who wake up one day in the middle of the woods with no recollection of how they got there or how they can get out.  The series opens with Mark Jorden (Richard Peterson) who wakes up alone in the woods thinking that he had partied too much the day before and can’t remember much of what happened.  He’s not too particularly concerned since from his own words he’s a good old boy from North Georgia who just thinks he wondered into the woods.  It isn’t until the third episode that Mark meets Adam Kane (Gary Babiarz) a mysterious backpacker and camper who has food, fire, and can provide Mark with shelter.  It’s not until episode five that we meet the other two parts of our quartet Helena Frae (Angie Harrel) and Baz (Adam Mauldin), a lawyer with basic knowledge of faunae and a video gamer/college student, respectfully.  Both Helena and Baz have been traveling on the same road for three days when they encounter Mark and Kane.  The story doesn’t really jump into gear until Mark begins to suspect Kane of something nefarious (episode 7) at which point for some odd reason he thinks it’s better that he and Baz split from the group to go out on their own despite the fact that Kane has the food, fire, and means of shelter.  Away from Kane and Helena, Mark starts to go little nuts before he and Baz have an altercation at which point the two helpless guys once again run into Kane and Helena and a huge mystery is finally solved just as the series ends opening up for season 2.

Nielsen wrote and directed the entire web series and immediately by the end you’ll pick up on the fact that he was heavily influenced by the film Predators (2010) which is both a good and bad thing.  The bad thing is that the setup is something we’ve seen before in countless horror films and that’s exactly what you would expect from this story except it’s less a horror story and more a sci-fi story only it never fully commits to being a sci-fi story.  There is very little setup for what will ultimately be a sci-fi story, in fact, the first three episodes make it seem like it will be some type of mystery drama but the biggest problem there is that Mark is not a pro-active character and he just meanders through the first five episodes until he decides to run away from Kane instead of confronting him head on.  A mystery only works if there is a character actively trying to solve the mystery.  

There is nothing for Helena or Baz to do in the series other than play follow the leader and since they are absent from many episodes you never really get a sense of what drives them if anything.  None of the characters seem to be in a hurry to get anywhere or do anything to drive the story forward.  Kane is one of the more interesting characters but he isn’t utilized to the best of the story’s capabilities especially since he is at the heart of the big reveal at the end of the first season.  The story does have a group of what could be interesting characters if they had been given something to drive them and to make them want to get out of the woods as soon as possible.

Another thing to take into consideration is the lack of a compelling setup for the sci-fi elements of the story.  After three episodes of straight drama what little sci-fi we get seems to come out of left field (episode 4) until the series’ final reveal (episode 10).  Whether they are incorporated into story or visual there needs to be adequate setup for these sci-fi conventions in order for them to be convincing to the audience and to help drive the narrative.

Now the good.  I loved the hand held aesthetic of the series.  It puts you right into the story of the people lost in the woods.  I would even say that the film makers could have gone even further because the story lends itself to some immediacy.  Also I was impressed with the music and editing which for an indie web series is hard to come by.  The film makers obliviously are trying to present a web series with high production values on a small budget.  With the exception of the episode that takes place all at night everything looked good (that episode had some minor lighting issues but I wasn’t sure if this was because of camera issues or transfer to condensed file size).  There was only minor sound issues with wind noise in the final episode but this did not take away from the series as a whole.  All the cast did a pretty good job although I would have liked to see more quirkiness from the lawyer who has a love of nature fetish and Kane who could have been taken farther with his other worldliness.  I believe this is a tough decision for and writer or director when dealing with material of this sort – how serious or quirky should the tone and mood be?  Babiarz does a great job as Kane and I’m looking forward to seeing where they take this character in season two.

Speaking of season two, season one does a pretty good job of setting of the world of the series, which I believe was the intended goal.  At only 2 minutes per episode and maybe a combined 25 minutes of running time this web series is an extended trailer for a much bigger film.  If the film makers wanted to craft a trailer for a bigger project or feature film (in order to raise money for this bigger project) then they succeeded but on its own it’s just a mediocre first season.  Despite the first 2 episodes being dull and boring the later episodes do pick up steam and you can tell there is life within the web series if it’s given time to develop all of its ideas and at only 2 minutes each episode goes by extremely fast.  My advice to the film makers would be to develop the characters motivations and drive for the series (and make Baz an even bigger video game geek as he has some of the best lines in this season), create a mystery that will drive the characters and plot forward, and don’t be afraid to pull out those sci-fi touches because the last thing you want audiences thinking is that “Lost in the Woods” is just another one of those low budget horror films about a bunch of stupid people doing stupid things in the woods (or a cabin, take your pick).

You can watch all of Matt Nielsen’s  web series “Lost in the Woods” at Blip TV http://blip.tv/lost-in-the-woods#ShowDescription

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Film Review: HORRIBLE HORROR Hosted By Zacherley




If you like horror show hosts than the name Zacherley will mean something to you.  I’ve known of Zacherley for many years but had never actually seen him at work until now with the feature Horrible Horror.  The film is a best & worst of clips anthology depicting scenes from approximately fifty classic films.

Zacherley is an old and wise…man who lives in a crypt with his faithful assistant Igor (whom you always hear but never see) but at the beginning of the film Zacherley is being forced to abandon his crypt but he wants to leave his audience by showing them clips from a few of his most trusted friends (both good and bad).  The film is not only filled with clips from films but also trailers.    

For a “clips” movie the real treat is when Zacherley interrupts with his “puns” and “witticisms” which is why anyone would even bother with these types of films.  Zacherley doesn’t just comment on the films but he entertains you (more so than the clips from the films that you are shown).  Therein is the only good thing about the film.  The clips that he’s decided to show border on being so obscure that even the most seasoned horror and sci-fi fan may not have even seen them.  I sure didn’t and the fact that there are no indicators from which film the clips came from makes keeping up with the film a tad hard.

Directed by David Bergman the film is best when it focuses on Zacherley and a more organized arrangement of the clips would have been helpful.  Modern audiences will probably see the film as badly dated but those with an appreciation for horror show hosts will find this an unexpected find.